You can find an overview of the core questions (note that journals may also employ additional journal-specific questions). The editor will weigh all views and may call for another opinion or ask the author for a revised paper before making a decision. The submission system provides reviewers with a notification of the final decision, if the journal has opted in to this functionality.
Experts also are often asked to review the work of other professionals. Understanding the main points and arguments of the article is essential for an accurate summation. Logical evaluation of the article’s main theme, supporting arguments, and implications for further research is an important element of a review. Elsevier embraces new AI-driven technologies that support reviewers and editors in the editorial process, such as those used during the screening process to conduct completeness and plagiarism checks and identify suitable reviewers. These identity-protected technologies conform to the RELX Responsible AI Principles(opens in new tab/window). We continue to develop and adopt in-house or licensed technologies that can assist editors and reviewers while respecting confidentiality, proprietary and data privacy rights.
In other disciplines, such as the testing of devices or technology, authors should explain whether it will be applied or used by all genders and if it has been tested with a user’s gender in mind. When you sit down to write the review, make sure you familiarize yourself with any journal-specific guidelines (these will be noted in the journal’s guide for authors available on each journal’s homepage). If you accept, you must treat the materials you receive as confidential documents. This means you can’t share them with anyone without prior authorization from the editor.
For example, a major media conglomerate that owns both print media and record companies may instruct one of its employees in one of its newspapers to do a review of an album which is being released by the conglomerate’s record company. If the study included only one sex/gender, ensure this has been justified. If the study included more than one sex/gender, ensure data are reported for all the options that were recorded and that data disaggregated by sex/gender are reported in full, in the main text or in the appendix or supplementary materials. It is important to assess whether the methodology is appropriate to capture possible sex and gender aspects. As a peer reviewer you may request sub-group analysis if deemed necessary and check if all data are provided disaggregated by sex, as a minimum. Although it might sound late, given that the research has already been concluded and the data analyzed, the peer review process can still play an important role in ensuring effective, transparent and complete sex and gender reporting.
Garner and Ed Helms play parents who switch bodies with their teen children right before Christmas in the McG-directed movie. The stars play a married couple whose determination to win a neighborhood house-decorating contest puts them in the path of a vengeful elf. The veteran actor plays an assassin dealing with some dangerous problems in a film co-starring Morena Baccarin and the late James Caan. This midrange laptop boasts a solid chassis in a cool, blue hue but needs a better display and speakers along with a more competitive price.
- Although it might sound late, given that the research has already been concluded and the data analyzed, the peer review process can still play an important role in ensuring effective, transparent and complete sex and gender reporting.
- When you consider that each song on an artist’s album is often priced at the same amount, the odds of the average consumer purchase the entire album instead of selecting the “hit” songs decreases significantly.
- In other disciplines, such as the testing of devices or technology, authors should explain whether it will be applied or used by all genders and if it has been tested with a user’s gender in mind.
- Respond to the invitation as soon as you can (even if it is to decline) — a delay in your decision slows down the review process and means more waiting for the author.
We haven’t even seen a review of the piece; the footlights go up with a jump, and now the curtain rises. After earning rave reviews early in the pandemic, Newsom is now under heavy fire, even from allies, for his handling of the coronavirus. Marshall wrote in an email to VOSD that the Housing Commission staff have done an expansive review of research and methods other jurisdictions have used. We explain what you need to know about top products and services — from cards to cars. It would have been a sort of review—in the face of the city of Dublin, in open defiance of all order and government. Nothing will be easier then to throw the Poles into the shade of the picture, or to occupy the foreground with a brilliant review.
Your review will help the editor decide whether or not to publish the article. It will also aid the author and allow them to improve their manuscript. Giving your overall opinion and general observations of the article is essential. Your comments should be courteous and constructive, and should not include any ad hominem remarks or personal details including your name (unless the journal you are invited to review for employs open peer review). Once you are satisfied that the methodology is sufficiently robust, examine any data in the form of figures, tables, or images. Authors may add research data, including data visualizations, to their submission to enable readers to interact and engage more closely with their research after publication.
One type of user http://moviepros.net/ can be in the physical world, such as a video reviewing a product or software. Grammarly has tips and tricks for how to keep your review informative, enlightening, and kind. If the review is critical, try to find at least one positive to include, just to provide a break in between your incredible zings.
You should indicate whether your comments are your own opinion or are reflected by the data and evidence. Your review will be managed via an Elsevier submission system such as Editorial Manager(opens in new tab/window). Elsevier journals use different submission systems so there is no one generic login link. To access the paper and deliver your review, click on the link in the invitation email you received which will bring you to the submission/reviewing system. These examples are programmatically compiled from various online sources to illustrate current usage of the word ‘review.’ Any opinions expressed in the examples do not represent those of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Also, here is an example of a published peer review report(opens in new tab/window).